Contact Us


Send a Message

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.

Newsletter

West Branch Capital Logo

Independent fee-only, minority owned SEC Registered Investment Adviser

Bond Market Update

October 18, 2023
Bond Market Update

Interest rates continued to march higher in the third quarter. In July the Federal Reserve raised the Fed Funds rate for the tenth time to a range of 5.25%-5.5%. The labor market remains firm with the unemployment rate to 3.8%. Although inflation has declined, it is still not near the Fed’s target of 2%. The battle to bring inflation down is being complicated by higher energy prices due to OPEC+ withholding production, a still firm economy, strong labor markets, and high interest rates which trickles into inflation of goods and services.


Fed officials are concerned about the risk of raising rates too little and allowing high inflation to grow entrenched and raising rates too much and causing a severe downturn. A recession in the next six to nine months is still a strong possibility. The full impact of the ten interest rate increases has yet to be felt. The yield curve remains inverted, although less so, an event which typically is a precursor to recessions. If an economic slowdown were to occur, then we can expect a pivot to rate cuts. However, absent a recession, which should be preceded by a climb in the unemployment rate, short term interest rates may remain at current levels for an extended period. The Fed did not raise rates at its September meeting but in his statement, Fed chairman Powell indicated rates will stay higher for longer. This has spooked both bond and equity markets. Bond yields rose significantly near quarter end as a result.


Here is a recap of yield levels this year for US treasury securities:


bond market update

As this chart shows, the yield curve’s inversion is not as extreme. The 2– to 10-year spread is now -47 basis points versus -106 basis points at the end of June. With the Fed almost done with rate hikes there is less risk of much higher short-term rates. The more extreme move in the 10-year can only be explained by heightened fears of inflation and possibly a supply demand imbalance for US government securities; the Fed has been reducing its holdings of treasuries through both maturities and outright sales while at the same time the government’s growing deficit has increased the supply of treasuries.


Total returns on all types of bonds have been negative this year. We have emphasized shorter maturity bonds as interest rates moved higher. The worst returns have been on ultra long bonds. Take for example the US Treasury 1.25% due May 15, 2052, which today trades at a price less than $50 down from $100 less than 3 years ago. A return even worse than you would experience in the stock market. A sharp reversal in interest rates would of course see these bonds increase significantly in price.


While the current level of yields exceeded our expectations, we feel current interest rate levels are at or near the peak for this cycle. Short term rates at a 22 year will eventually work their way into slowing the economy. The sharp increase in longer term rates will act as a mechanism to slow growth and is in effect acting as another rate increase. Therefore, while it may be an extended period before rate cuts, absent a further spike in inflation, it does not mean interest rates have to rise much further.


Going forward we see four factors which can negatively impact the economy and contribute to causing a recession:


  • Costly labor agreements as highlighted by the auto workers and Hollywood workers’ strikes, among others.
  • A potential government shutdown once the current budget agreement expires in mid-November.
  • Recent resumption of student loan payments impacting consumer spending.
  • Oil shocks from recent world events, a negative for a variety of reasons.


While not all of these may occur; even one or two, combined with historically high interest rates, could slow growth enough in the next six to nine months for the Fed to begin to reduce interest rates. A pivot to rate cuts if a recession were to occur would lead to at least a modest decline in interest rates.


A look at Bond Yields


With rising interest rates, bonds are now back in the spotlight. When yields were low, investors looked at bonds more for protection as opposed to high income. Now with higher yields, people are looking at bonds for both return of principal and high earnings. When buying bonds or bond funds it is important to know that there are many kinds of yield, and they are all calculated differently. These include current yield, yield to maturity, yield to call, yield to worst, and SEC yield.


Let’s look at each of these and highlight any shortcomings:


Current yield – this is calculated by taking a bond’s coupon divided by its price. This yield accounts only for the coupon income with no consideration given for a discount or premium bond which would result in capital gain or loss if held to maturity. It also ignores the time value of money where a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future.


Yield to maturity – this is the most common measure used to bond yields. It does consider the time value of money and is an accurate measure of a bond’s yield.


Yield to call – for bonds that can be redeemed prior to maturity, this is the yield on a bond to its first call or redemption date. For bonds purchased at a premium you will most likely earn the yield to call (which would be lower) not the yield to maturity since these bonds have a good chance of being redeemed prior to maturity.


Yield to worst – For individual bonds it is helpful to compare the yield to maturity to the yield to call to see which will result in the lowest yield. This is known as the yield to worst. In the above case, the yield to call would be the lower expected yield.


Note: The above measures of yield are less relevant for bond funds since bond managers rarely hold bonds to maturity.


SEC yield – this metric was introduced by the Securities and Exchange commission and is designed to give investors a meaningful way to compare yields on bond funds. It is a measure of a fund’s income over the past 30 days.


Just as there is no single way to value equities, the same is true of yield calculations for bonds. Using only one measure of yield could mean a bond investor misses out on important signals particularly when yields are changing rapidly. For example, with the recent rapid rise in yields the focus for individual bonds should be on yield to maturity as yield to call will not be a factor in most cases.


As always, if you have questions about the bond market or other topics, reach us at (833) 888-0534 x 2 or by email.

 


The views and information contained in this article and on this website are those of West Branch Capital LLC and are provided for general information. The information herein should not serve as the sole determining factor for making legal, tax, or investment decisions. All information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but West Branch Capital LLC does not guarantee its reliability. West Branch Capital LLC is not an attorney, accountant or actuary and does not provide legal, tax, accounting or actuarial advice.



About The Author

James K. Ho

Jim has over thirty years of investment management experience. He is a Managing Director and Principal of the firm. Prior to West Branch Capital, Jim was a fixed income Portfolio Manager at John Hancock Advisors. Previously, he managed the John Hancock Tax Exempt Income Trust. Prior to joining John Hancock Advisors, Jim was a Senior Investment Officer at The New England (MetLife), where he managed multiple bond portfolios, including taxable and tax exempt mutual funds and separate accounts. Jim holds an M.B.A. from Columbia University, New York, as well as an M.S. in Applied Math and B.S. in Applied Math and Economics from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst and a member of the Boston Society of Security Analysts.

Recent Articles

November 8, 2024
How do my income taxes affect my Medicare premiums? Although most Medicare enrollees are paying a Medicare Part B premium of $174.70 in 2024, many people pay much more. Prior to 2007, everyone received the same 75% subsidy from the government and paid the same premium. Then IRMAA (Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) was implemented, which established a bracket system for both Part B and Part D (prescriptions). The higher your income, the lower the subsidy and the higher your Medicare premium. Because Medicare uses your tax return from two years prior to determine your premium for the coming year, your 2024 premium was based on your 2022 tax return. The specific income figure used is Modified Adjusted Gross Income, which adds tax-exempt income to the AGI figure you see on your tax return. Sometimes, the higher premium comes as a shock, after a year of unusually high income, perhaps due to a capital gain from the sale of a home. But if that is the case, the higher premium will only be applied for one year, and once income declines, so will the premium. It’s important to know that if there has been a life-changing event that reduced your household income, such as retirement or the loss of a spouse, you can apply to have the premium lowered. Are there ways to limit the higher premiums? There may be. First, avoid (if possible) making large withdrawals from your tax-deferred retirement plans, including Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, in a single year, or taking a very large capital gain on a stock sale in a nonretirement account in any one tax year. Instead, try to spread the IRA withdrawals or capital gains over two or more years, or take a capital loss if you have any in your nonretirement account. You also may be able to make a tax-deductible IRA contribution to lower your AGI below the IRMAA threshold, as long as you had earned income during the year and qualify for a deduction. Are my charitable contributions deductible? Ever since the 2017 tax law increased the standard deduction (while eliminating the personal exemption), most people do not see a reduction their taxes as a result of making charitable contributions. However, there are some exceptions. Taxpayers whose total itemized deductions (medical expenses above a certain threshold, mortgage interest, state and local taxes up to $10,000, charitable contributions) exceed their standard deduction can lower their taxes with charitable contributions. There is also something called a Qualified Charitable Deduction (QCD), available to IRA owners over age 70½. Under current tax law, you can instruct your IRA custodian to send your contribution directly from your IRA to the qualified charity or send you the check made out to the charity, which you can forward, rather than making the charitable contribution yourself. This has the same effect as a tax deduction because it lowers the amount of your taxable IRA distributions. It may also lower your AGI enough to reduce your Medicare premium or your capital gains rate. Withdrawals to make a QCD can count toward your Required Minimum Distribution for the year. Additional points on charitable deductions: (1) Most of the provisions in the 2017 tax law expire in 2025, so in 2026 we could see reinstated personal exemptions and a return to lower standard deductions, which would make charitable contributions more likely to lower your tax liability. (2) Some states, including Massachusetts (cash contributions only) and New York, allow a charitable deduction against income for state income taxes. How much of my Social Security income is taxed? There is a rather complicated formula that determines the taxable portion of your Social Security benefits. The formula adds half of your Social Security income to your AGI plus your tax-exempt income to get provisional income. If that figure falls under $25,000 (single filer) or $32,000 (joint filer), none of the benefits are taxable, which is the case for about 60% of recipients, who have little or no income other than Social Security. The other 40% pay tax on between 1% and 85% of their Social Security income, but no more than 85%, regardless of how much additional income they have. As time goes on, more and more people pay tax on more and more of their SS income, because the formula does not get adjusted for inflation every year, unlike with most other tax figures and unlike with SS benefits themselves. Note: State taxation of Social Security varies, with some states, including Massachusetts, not taxing it at all. What is the Net Investment Income Tax? Most taxpayers do not pay this tax, which came into being in 2013 to help cover the cost of the Medicare program. The approximately 5% of taxpayers who are subject to the tax have AGI of over $250,000 (joint) or $200,000 (single). The 3.8% tax is applied to either (1) the amount by which AGI exceeds these thresholds, or (2) the amount of net taxable investment income, whichever is lower. The same strategies discussed above regarding Medicare premiums could also be employed to minimize this tax. When I get a cost-of-living raise at work, will that push me into a higher income tax bracket? While a large raise at work could push you into a higher income tax bracket, if your raise is roughly equivalent to the inflation rate, it should not affect your marginal tax bracket. Every year, most tax figures, including tax bracket boundaries and the standard deduction, are adjusted to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by the “chained CPI”, an alternative to the traditional consumer price index, which attempts to account for the effects of product substitution on changes in the cost of living. Some figures, such as maximums for IRAs and 401(k) contributions, are adjusted only in years when applying the CPI rounds the figure up to the next increment, usually $500. What will happen to federal income tax rates and estate taxes in 2026? If Congress does nothing, most of the provisions of the 2017 tax legislation will expire and revert to the higher tax rate structure that was previously in place. However, leaders of both major political parties are not in favor of raising tax rates for taxpayers with less than $400,000 in income. The parties disagree on taxes for taxpayers with incomes above $400,000. There are also differences between the two parties on future of the estate tax exclusion, which will rise to $13,990,000 per person in 2025 but will fall to about half that in 2026 without action by Congress. Annual gifting is one way to lower one’s taxable estate. The annual gift tax exclusion in 2024 is $18,000 per person per donee for 2024 and is adjusted for inflation in $1,000 increments. As always, if you have any questions about taxes, please reach us any time at (833) 888-0534 x2 or info@westbranchcapital.com The views and information contained in this article and on this website are those of West Branch Capital LLC and are provided for general information. The information herein should not serve as the sole determining factor for making legal, tax, or investment decisions. All information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but West Branch Capital LLC does not guarantee its reliability. West Branch Capital LLC is not an attorney, accountant or actuary and does not provide legal, tax, accounting or actuarial advice.
November 7, 2024
One of the most important questions to ask about any investment account is: “what percentage of the account is allocated to equities (stocks)?” This is an important question, in general, because equity exposure will increase the volatility of the account. In a strong bull market (like we are experiencing currently), equity allocation is a major driver of positive returns relative to fixed income (bonds) or cash. During a stock market correction (decline), equity allocation will negatively impact performance relative to bonds or cash, therefore, in both instances contributing to large variability of the account value. It is important to note that these points are generalizations, not rules. There are exceptions. For example, a highly speculative fixed income investment like a junk bond can be more volatile than a high quality defensive stock. Generalizations are best applied to broad market indices (e.g. the S&P 500 and the U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) or baskets of well-chosen high-quality stocks and investment grade bonds. Because of the increased volatility of equities, they have an especially significant impact on any account during bull and bear markets. While past returns are no guarantee of future returns, equities have also delivered higher returns than fixed income over the long term historically. In the WBC client portal, you can view the performance of your holdings by asset class (Equity, Fixed Income, others) by clicking “Reports” along the top bar, then selecting “Account Performance” under “Performance” and scrolling down. Comparing Equity and Bond Returns Two of the most widely used performance measures for US equities and US investment grade bonds are the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (Ticker: SPY, which tracks the S&P 500) and the iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (Ticker: AGG, which tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index). Based on these two measures, as shown in the table below, equities have outperformed fixed income significantly. On a total return basis, equities have outperformed over the last 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20-year periods. Holding the S&P 500 for the last 20 years would have earned a 677% total return. This return is 598% higher than the total return from the bond index. 
How to Protect Against Inflation
By Ian Mahmud August 28, 2024
With inflation easing and the US economy showing some signs of weakness, the market is now turning its attention to a potential rate cut.

Share Article

Share by: