Contact Us


Send a Message

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.

Newsletter

West Branch Capital Logo

Independent fee-only, minority owned SEC Registered Investment Adviser

Opportunity Zones Offer Investors the Chance to Do Well and to Do Good

November 8, 2019
Investment Opportunity

Although the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did not receive bipartisan support, there is at least one provision in the legislation that has appeal to members of Congress and constituents on both sides. This provision offers what could potentially be a generous tax break to investors who reinvest their capital gains from other investments into economically distressed areas that have been designated as “Opportunity Zones”.


Throughout the country more than 8,700 census tracts have been designated as Opportunity Zones. The Zones were certified in every state, Washington, DC, and five US territories, including all of Puerto Rico, and are a mix of urban, rural, and, to a lesser extent, suburban areas. Local governments nominated the census tracts, and the US Treasury made the final determination.


The average poverty rate in the Opportunity Zones is about 30% and the median household income is just under 60% of the average in the wider geographic area. The unemployment rate is about 10 percentage points higher than the national average and more than one-third of prime age adults are not working. In addition to need, the Zones were selected for their potential for revitalization, as evidenced by some employment and business growth in recent years.


Investors with large unrealized capital gains can benefit in the following way:


  • The investor sells an existing asset that has appreciated in value.
  • The capital gain (all or a portion) is reinvested in an Opportunity Zone within 180 days.
  • The capital gains tax on that reinvested amount is deferred for at least five years, after which time 10% of the gain is excluded from taxation. If the investment is held for another two years, another five percent of the gain is also excluded. These deferred gains would be recognized on December 31, 2026, or on the date sold, whichever comes earlier.
  • If the investment in the Opportunity Zone is held for at least ten years, any gains on the Opportunity Zone investment itself are tax-free. This benefit has led to the coining of the term “Roth IRA for the rich”.


These investments are called Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOFs) by the IRS, which has gradually been releasing guidance. Although there has been some movement towards establishing such funds by several institutions, any actual investments are awaiting further information from the IRS in early 2019.


Theoretically, a QOF can be created by anyone, but the need to properly follow the regulations, conduct due diligence in the selection of appropriate projects for investment, cover the legal costs, and perform annual compliance and tax reporting suggest that the funds will be set up by experienced businesses and institutions and possibly by family offices (private wealth management firms that serve ultra-high-net-worth investors). Once QOFs are set up, individuals may be able to invest in them, with minimum investments probably starting at $25,000 or higher.


There is a wide range of projects in which QOFs can invest. The projects can include new real estate developments, substantial property upgrades that exceed a defined level and are made within 31 months of purchase, new business ventures, and other types of projects. Major players are expected to include real estate developers, private equity funds, venture capital companies, investment banks, and mutual funds. At least 90% of the fund must be invested in Opportunity Zones and the business investment itself must derive at least 50% of its gross income within the Zone. There are some types of businesses that do not qualify for the investments, including liquor stores, casinos, massage parlors, and golf courses. Also, financial services firms cannot simply locate in an Opportunity Zone and grow tax-free.


The provision is not without its critics. Results from past efforts that offered tax breaks to encourage private investment in low-income areas have not been as successful as hoped in achieving desired social ends. However, unlike past efforts, the tax benefits are not capped, fewer restrictions are placed on eligible businesses, and investors must stay in the investment for a longer period of time to reap the full tax benefit. Other critics feel that the benefits may not be worth the loss in tax revenue and that investments in the most attractive projects would have been made even without the tax break. And there is also concern that many of the projects will involve gentrification that will displace low-income residents.


The pool of money eligible for investment in Opportunity Zones is estimated to be around $6 trillion in unrealized capital gains, so there is tremendous potential, but it remains to be seen what portion of that money finds its way to Qualified Opportunity Funds, particularly at a time when tax rates are at historically low levels. Some investors may view investments in distressed areas as too risky for the potential tax savings. Even if the program attracts a lot of investment, the funds may not be distributed broadly or located where they are most needed, because participants may be motivated more by the tax benefits than by the benefits to society. In time, we will find out.


About The Author

Anne Christopulos

Anne is a Managing Director and Financial Planner with over twenty years of experience in the financial services industry. After holding corporate management positions in finance and strategic planning in New York City, she moved to Boston to become the Product Manager for the IRA business at Fidelity Investments. Following that, she was Vice President, Retirement Investments, at Fleet Financial Services. A native of Cape Cod, she returned to the Cape in 2001 and made the transition to personal financial planning with Secure Future Financial Services in Dennis and Davis Financial Services in Orleans before joining West Branch Capital. Anne holds a B.A. in music and economics from Wellesley College and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Recent Articles

November 8, 2024
How do my income taxes affect my Medicare premiums? Although most Medicare enrollees are paying a Medicare Part B premium of $174.70 in 2024, many people pay much more. Prior to 2007, everyone received the same 75% subsidy from the government and paid the same premium. Then IRMAA (Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) was implemented, which established a bracket system for both Part B and Part D (prescriptions). The higher your income, the lower the subsidy and the higher your Medicare premium. Because Medicare uses your tax return from two years prior to determine your premium for the coming year, your 2024 premium was based on your 2022 tax return. The specific income figure used is Modified Adjusted Gross Income, which adds tax-exempt income to the AGI figure you see on your tax return. Sometimes, the higher premium comes as a shock, after a year of unusually high income, perhaps due to a capital gain from the sale of a home. But if that is the case, the higher premium will only be applied for one year, and once income declines, so will the premium. It’s important to know that if there has been a life-changing event that reduced your household income, such as retirement or the loss of a spouse, you can apply to have the premium lowered. Are there ways to limit the higher premiums? There may be. First, avoid (if possible) making large withdrawals from your tax-deferred retirement plans, including Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, in a single year, or taking a very large capital gain on a stock sale in a nonretirement account in any one tax year. Instead, try to spread the IRA withdrawals or capital gains over two or more years, or take a capital loss if you have any in your nonretirement account. You also may be able to make a tax-deductible IRA contribution to lower your AGI below the IRMAA threshold, as long as you had earned income during the year and qualify for a deduction. Are my charitable contributions deductible? Ever since the 2017 tax law increased the standard deduction (while eliminating the personal exemption), most people do not see a reduction their taxes as a result of making charitable contributions. However, there are some exceptions. Taxpayers whose total itemized deductions (medical expenses above a certain threshold, mortgage interest, state and local taxes up to $10,000, charitable contributions) exceed their standard deduction can lower their taxes with charitable contributions. There is also something called a Qualified Charitable Deduction (QCD), available to IRA owners over age 70½. Under current tax law, you can instruct your IRA custodian to send your contribution directly from your IRA to the qualified charity or send you the check made out to the charity, which you can forward, rather than making the charitable contribution yourself. This has the same effect as a tax deduction because it lowers the amount of your taxable IRA distributions. It may also lower your AGI enough to reduce your Medicare premium or your capital gains rate. Withdrawals to make a QCD can count toward your Required Minimum Distribution for the year. Additional points on charitable deductions: (1) Most of the provisions in the 2017 tax law expire in 2025, so in 2026 we could see reinstated personal exemptions and a return to lower standard deductions, which would make charitable contributions more likely to lower your tax liability. (2) Some states, including Massachusetts (cash contributions only) and New York, allow a charitable deduction against income for state income taxes. How much of my Social Security income is taxed? There is a rather complicated formula that determines the taxable portion of your Social Security benefits. The formula adds half of your Social Security income to your AGI plus your tax-exempt income to get provisional income. If that figure falls under $25,000 (single filer) or $32,000 (joint filer), none of the benefits are taxable, which is the case for about 60% of recipients, who have little or no income other than Social Security. The other 40% pay tax on between 1% and 85% of their Social Security income, but no more than 85%, regardless of how much additional income they have. As time goes on, more and more people pay tax on more and more of their SS income, because the formula does not get adjusted for inflation every year, unlike with most other tax figures and unlike with SS benefits themselves. Note: State taxation of Social Security varies, with some states, including Massachusetts, not taxing it at all. What is the Net Investment Income Tax? Most taxpayers do not pay this tax, which came into being in 2013 to help cover the cost of the Medicare program. The approximately 5% of taxpayers who are subject to the tax have AGI of over $250,000 (joint) or $200,000 (single). The 3.8% tax is applied to either (1) the amount by which AGI exceeds these thresholds, or (2) the amount of net taxable investment income, whichever is lower. The same strategies discussed above regarding Medicare premiums could also be employed to minimize this tax. When I get a cost-of-living raise at work, will that push me into a higher income tax bracket? While a large raise at work could push you into a higher income tax bracket, if your raise is roughly equivalent to the inflation rate, it should not affect your marginal tax bracket. Every year, most tax figures, including tax bracket boundaries and the standard deduction, are adjusted to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by the “chained CPI”, an alternative to the traditional consumer price index, which attempts to account for the effects of product substitution on changes in the cost of living. Some figures, such as maximums for IRAs and 401(k) contributions, are adjusted only in years when applying the CPI rounds the figure up to the next increment, usually $500. What will happen to federal income tax rates and estate taxes in 2026? If Congress does nothing, most of the provisions of the 2017 tax legislation will expire and revert to the higher tax rate structure that was previously in place. However, leaders of both major political parties are not in favor of raising tax rates for taxpayers with less than $400,000 in income. The parties disagree on taxes for taxpayers with incomes above $400,000. There are also differences between the two parties on future of the estate tax exclusion, which will rise to $13,990,000 per person in 2025 but will fall to about half that in 2026 without action by Congress. Annual gifting is one way to lower one’s taxable estate. The annual gift tax exclusion in 2024 is $18,000 per person per donee for 2024 and is adjusted for inflation in $1,000 increments. As always, if you have any questions about taxes, please reach us any time at (833) 888-0534 x2 or info@westbranchcapital.com The views and information contained in this article and on this website are those of West Branch Capital LLC and are provided for general information. The information herein should not serve as the sole determining factor for making legal, tax, or investment decisions. All information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but West Branch Capital LLC does not guarantee its reliability. West Branch Capital LLC is not an attorney, accountant or actuary and does not provide legal, tax, accounting or actuarial advice.
November 7, 2024
One of the most important questions to ask about any investment account is: “what percentage of the account is allocated to equities (stocks)?” This is an important question, in general, because equity exposure will increase the volatility of the account. In a strong bull market (like we are experiencing currently), equity allocation is a major driver of positive returns relative to fixed income (bonds) or cash. During a stock market correction (decline), equity allocation will negatively impact performance relative to bonds or cash, therefore, in both instances contributing to large variability of the account value. It is important to note that these points are generalizations, not rules. There are exceptions. For example, a highly speculative fixed income investment like a junk bond can be more volatile than a high quality defensive stock. Generalizations are best applied to broad market indices (e.g. the S&P 500 and the U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) or baskets of well-chosen high-quality stocks and investment grade bonds. Because of the increased volatility of equities, they have an especially significant impact on any account during bull and bear markets. While past returns are no guarantee of future returns, equities have also delivered higher returns than fixed income over the long term historically. In the WBC client portal, you can view the performance of your holdings by asset class (Equity, Fixed Income, others) by clicking “Reports” along the top bar, then selecting “Account Performance” under “Performance” and scrolling down. Comparing Equity and Bond Returns Two of the most widely used performance measures for US equities and US investment grade bonds are the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (Ticker: SPY, which tracks the S&P 500) and the iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (Ticker: AGG, which tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index). Based on these two measures, as shown in the table below, equities have outperformed fixed income significantly. On a total return basis, equities have outperformed over the last 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20-year periods. Holding the S&P 500 for the last 20 years would have earned a 677% total return. This return is 598% higher than the total return from the bond index. 
How to Protect Against Inflation
By Ian Mahmud August 28, 2024
With inflation easing and the US economy showing some signs of weakness, the market is now turning its attention to a potential rate cut.

Share Article

Share by: