Contact Us


Send a Message

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.

Newsletter

West Branch Capital Logo

Independent fee-only, minority owned SEC Registered Investment Adviser

The Bond Market Corner – Winter 2019

November 8, 2019
The Bond Market Corner - winter 2019

In the fourth quarter of 2018, equity and bond markets reversed direction from trends established through most of the previous nine months. Tough talk on tariffs and more signs of a slowing economy both in the US and globally weighed on equities, while at the same time helping treasury bond prices advance (leading to lower yields). There was much talk of the Fed pausing in its tightening cycle in response to the decline in equity markets worldwide as well as to clear signs of economic weakness. However, on December 19, the Fed raised the Federal Funds rate by .25% and signaled it would likely raise rates two more times in 2019. Although this was a slight downward adjustment from previously when it was thought they would raise rates three times in 2019, the risk markets were disappointed and continued their decline lower. This increase puts the Federal Funds target rate in the range of 2.25%-2.5%. The Fed did acknowledge that there are more risks to global growth reflected in its softened language regarding future increases in interest rates. Early in 2019 the Fed signaled it will likely slow its rate increases further, if not stop them altogether, in response to equity market volatility and its impact on the economy.


The 10-year treasury yield ended the year at 2.69% down from 3.05% at the end of the third quarter but up from 2.41% at year-end 2017. The 10-year yield rose to as high as 3.23% during the quarter before declining as investors sought safety in government bonds. Bond investors are concerned the Fed’s interest rate plans could lead to a slower pace of growth. Additionally, tariffs on US goods could hurt exports of domestic companies, adding to growth concerns. The closely watched spread between the two-year and 10-year yield ended at 21 basis points—this compares to 24 basis points at the end of September and 53 basis points at year end 2017. As a reminder, we are watching this closely as a flattening yield curve typically signals potential economic weakness; investors are more inclined to invest longer for less yield when they expect rates to decline further in response to a softening economy. While the 2/10 spread is still positive, other parts of the curve have turned negative. For example, investors can now invest in a one-year treasury bill and earn more than a two– or five-year note. The two-year treasury is now yielding about the same as the five-year. What this shows is investors are concerned the Fed may raise rates too much leading to an economic slowdown and lower rates. Therefore, they are inclined to accept a lower yield for a longer term to lock in that rate in the expectation that interest rates may decline. This is a phenomenon that bears watching.


In 2018 the expectation was that with a continued strong economy, inflation would increase and bond yields would rise significantly in response. Investors who believed this would have purchased inflation protected bonds. These bonds do well when inflation is rising since their principal value increases with inflation. However, higher inflation did not materialize. Price levels remain within the Fed’s 2% target range. As a result, the 10-year breakeven inflation rate stands at a low 1.7%. This number represents the difference between the nominal US treasury 10 bond yield and the inflation protected 10-year bond yield. Essentially, this is the level of inflation investors expect each year for the next ten years.

With price levels seemingly under control and volatile equity markets, the Fed’s next move may in fact be to do nothing and perhaps to even reduce rates.


The case for corporate bonds


In the fourth quarter, corporate bond spreads widened along with the decline in equity markets. However, for the year 2018, despite rising yields and widening spreads, owning corporate bonds turned out to be a relatively sound strategy. Corporate bonds which trade at a yield spread over treasuries did suffer as their spreads widened with the decline in the equity markets. However, even with treasury yields increasing and spreads widening during the year, the value of many of these bonds were not significantly impacted. Many of our clients have invested in a bond ladder made up of a series of maturities. With a bond ladder the bond holdings will roll down the yield curve. In other words, a five-year bond at the end of 2017 is now a four-year bond at the end of 2018. Since shorter term bonds trade at a smaller yield premium to treasuries and also decline less in price for a given change in yield, the rolldown helps preserve value.


An example will illustrate this point (see chart below).


12/31/2017 12/31/2018
3-year treasury yield 2.01%
2-year treasury yield 2.67%
Yield spread to treasury +35 +50
Yield of Corporate bond 2% coupon due 12/31/20 2.36% 3.12%
Price of corporate bond $98.96 $97.85


The three-year bond at the beginning of 2017 is now a two-year bond at the end of 2018. As this illustrates, despite an increase in yields (the three-year yield was 2.01% at the end of 2017 now the two-year has increased at the end of 2018 to 2.67%) and a widening in yield spread on this corporate bond (+35 to +50), at the end of 2018 this bond which is now a two-year bond, is only marginally lower in price one year later due to the roll down effect. When you add in the one year of income it almost eliminates the negative performance. Of course, shorter term bonds will benefit more from the rolldown than longer term bonds in a rising rate environment, but the concept will generally hold true. Additionally, with a laddered bond portfolio, maturing bonds can be reinvested at today’s higher yields.

While there was no place to hide in 2018, investing in corporate bonds helped to minimized negative returns.



About The Author

James K. Ho

Jim has over thirty years of investment management experience. He is a Managing Director and Principal of the firm. Prior to West Branch Capital, Jim was a fixed income Portfolio Manager at John Hancock Advisors. Previously, he managed the John Hancock Tax Exempt Income Trust. Prior to joining John Hancock Advisors, Jim was a Senior Investment Officer at The New England (MetLife), where he managed multiple bond portfolios, including taxable and tax exempt mutual funds and separate accounts. Jim holds an M.B.A. from Columbia University, New York, as well as an M.S. in Applied Math and B.S. in Applied Math and Economics from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst and a member of the Boston Society of Security Analysts.

Recent Articles

November 8, 2024
How do my income taxes affect my Medicare premiums? Although most Medicare enrollees are paying a Medicare Part B premium of $174.70 in 2024, many people pay much more. Prior to 2007, everyone received the same 75% subsidy from the government and paid the same premium. Then IRMAA (Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) was implemented, which established a bracket system for both Part B and Part D (prescriptions). The higher your income, the lower the subsidy and the higher your Medicare premium. Because Medicare uses your tax return from two years prior to determine your premium for the coming year, your 2024 premium was based on your 2022 tax return. The specific income figure used is Modified Adjusted Gross Income, which adds tax-exempt income to the AGI figure you see on your tax return. Sometimes, the higher premium comes as a shock, after a year of unusually high income, perhaps due to a capital gain from the sale of a home. But if that is the case, the higher premium will only be applied for one year, and once income declines, so will the premium. It’s important to know that if there has been a life-changing event that reduced your household income, such as retirement or the loss of a spouse, you can apply to have the premium lowered. Are there ways to limit the higher premiums? There may be. First, avoid (if possible) making large withdrawals from your tax-deferred retirement plans, including Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, in a single year, or taking a very large capital gain on a stock sale in a nonretirement account in any one tax year. Instead, try to spread the IRA withdrawals or capital gains over two or more years, or take a capital loss if you have any in your nonretirement account. You also may be able to make a tax-deductible IRA contribution to lower your AGI below the IRMAA threshold, as long as you had earned income during the year and qualify for a deduction. Are my charitable contributions deductible? Ever since the 2017 tax law increased the standard deduction (while eliminating the personal exemption), most people do not see a reduction their taxes as a result of making charitable contributions. However, there are some exceptions. Taxpayers whose total itemized deductions (medical expenses above a certain threshold, mortgage interest, state and local taxes up to $10,000, charitable contributions) exceed their standard deduction can lower their taxes with charitable contributions. There is also something called a Qualified Charitable Deduction (QCD), available to IRA owners over age 70½. Under current tax law, you can instruct your IRA custodian to send your contribution directly from your IRA to the qualified charity or send you the check made out to the charity, which you can forward, rather than making the charitable contribution yourself. This has the same effect as a tax deduction because it lowers the amount of your taxable IRA distributions. It may also lower your AGI enough to reduce your Medicare premium or your capital gains rate. Withdrawals to make a QCD can count toward your Required Minimum Distribution for the year. Additional points on charitable deductions: (1) Most of the provisions in the 2017 tax law expire in 2025, so in 2026 we could see reinstated personal exemptions and a return to lower standard deductions, which would make charitable contributions more likely to lower your tax liability. (2) Some states, including Massachusetts (cash contributions only) and New York, allow a charitable deduction against income for state income taxes. How much of my Social Security income is taxed? There is a rather complicated formula that determines the taxable portion of your Social Security benefits. The formula adds half of your Social Security income to your AGI plus your tax-exempt income to get provisional income. If that figure falls under $25,000 (single filer) or $32,000 (joint filer), none of the benefits are taxable, which is the case for about 60% of recipients, who have little or no income other than Social Security. The other 40% pay tax on between 1% and 85% of their Social Security income, but no more than 85%, regardless of how much additional income they have. As time goes on, more and more people pay tax on more and more of their SS income, because the formula does not get adjusted for inflation every year, unlike with most other tax figures and unlike with SS benefits themselves. Note: State taxation of Social Security varies, with some states, including Massachusetts, not taxing it at all. What is the Net Investment Income Tax? Most taxpayers do not pay this tax, which came into being in 2013 to help cover the cost of the Medicare program. The approximately 5% of taxpayers who are subject to the tax have AGI of over $250,000 (joint) or $200,000 (single). The 3.8% tax is applied to either (1) the amount by which AGI exceeds these thresholds, or (2) the amount of net taxable investment income, whichever is lower. The same strategies discussed above regarding Medicare premiums could also be employed to minimize this tax. When I get a cost-of-living raise at work, will that push me into a higher income tax bracket? While a large raise at work could push you into a higher income tax bracket, if your raise is roughly equivalent to the inflation rate, it should not affect your marginal tax bracket. Every year, most tax figures, including tax bracket boundaries and the standard deduction, are adjusted to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by the “chained CPI”, an alternative to the traditional consumer price index, which attempts to account for the effects of product substitution on changes in the cost of living. Some figures, such as maximums for IRAs and 401(k) contributions, are adjusted only in years when applying the CPI rounds the figure up to the next increment, usually $500. What will happen to federal income tax rates and estate taxes in 2026? If Congress does nothing, most of the provisions of the 2017 tax legislation will expire and revert to the higher tax rate structure that was previously in place. However, leaders of both major political parties are not in favor of raising tax rates for taxpayers with less than $400,000 in income. The parties disagree on taxes for taxpayers with incomes above $400,000. There are also differences between the two parties on future of the estate tax exclusion, which will rise to $13,990,000 per person in 2025 but will fall to about half that in 2026 without action by Congress. Annual gifting is one way to lower one’s taxable estate. The annual gift tax exclusion in 2024 is $18,000 per person per donee for 2024 and is adjusted for inflation in $1,000 increments. As always, if you have any questions about taxes, please reach us any time at (833) 888-0534 x2 or info@westbranchcapital.com The views and information contained in this article and on this website are those of West Branch Capital LLC and are provided for general information. The information herein should not serve as the sole determining factor for making legal, tax, or investment decisions. All information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but West Branch Capital LLC does not guarantee its reliability. West Branch Capital LLC is not an attorney, accountant or actuary and does not provide legal, tax, accounting or actuarial advice.
November 7, 2024
One of the most important questions to ask about any investment account is: “what percentage of the account is allocated to equities (stocks)?” This is an important question, in general, because equity exposure will increase the volatility of the account. In a strong bull market (like we are experiencing currently), equity allocation is a major driver of positive returns relative to fixed income (bonds) or cash. During a stock market correction (decline), equity allocation will negatively impact performance relative to bonds or cash, therefore, in both instances contributing to large variability of the account value. It is important to note that these points are generalizations, not rules. There are exceptions. For example, a highly speculative fixed income investment like a junk bond can be more volatile than a high quality defensive stock. Generalizations are best applied to broad market indices (e.g. the S&P 500 and the U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) or baskets of well-chosen high-quality stocks and investment grade bonds. Because of the increased volatility of equities, they have an especially significant impact on any account during bull and bear markets. While past returns are no guarantee of future returns, equities have also delivered higher returns than fixed income over the long term historically. In the WBC client portal, you can view the performance of your holdings by asset class (Equity, Fixed Income, others) by clicking “Reports” along the top bar, then selecting “Account Performance” under “Performance” and scrolling down. Comparing Equity and Bond Returns Two of the most widely used performance measures for US equities and US investment grade bonds are the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (Ticker: SPY, which tracks the S&P 500) and the iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (Ticker: AGG, which tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index). Based on these two measures, as shown in the table below, equities have outperformed fixed income significantly. On a total return basis, equities have outperformed over the last 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20-year periods. Holding the S&P 500 for the last 20 years would have earned a 677% total return. This return is 598% higher than the total return from the bond index. 
How to Protect Against Inflation
By Ian Mahmud August 28, 2024
With inflation easing and the US economy showing some signs of weakness, the market is now turning its attention to a potential rate cut.

Share Article

Share by: